MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_113_17

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine · 2017

Functional outcome in unstable Hangman's fracture managed with anterior approach: A prospective study.

Jain Vaibhav, Thakur Manoj Kumar, Thakur Amit, Sud Sachin, Lal Mukund, Madan Ankit

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To study the functional outcome in unstable Hangman s fracture managed with anterior decompression and stabilization with cervical locking plate and tricortical bone graft.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2016, 44 patients (range: 19-75 years) with unstable Hangman's fracture underwent anterior decompression and stabilization with cervical locking plate and tricortical bone graft in our institution.

RESULT: According to the Levine and Edwards classification, all patients were unstable with Type IA 6 (13.6), Type IIA 35 (79.5%), Type II (0), and Type III (6.8). The mean period of follow-up was 17 months (range: 6-48 months). Neurological recovery was observed in all nine patients. All patients were relieved from axial pain. None of the patients received blood transfusion. All patients showed solid fusion with no complication related to bone graft and plate.

CONCLUSION

The anterior C2/C3 discectomy, fusion, and stabilization with cervical locking plate and tricortical bone graft are feasible and safe method in treating HangmanÊs fracture, with the benefit of high primary stability, anatomical reduction, and direct decompression of the spinal cord.

Для цитирования: Jain Vaibhav, Thakur Manoj Kumar, Thakur Amit, Sud Sachin, Lal Mukund, Madan Ankit. Functional outcome in unstable Hangman's fracture managed with anterior approach: A prospective study.. Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. 2017. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_113_17.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.