MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.06.001

Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery] · 2018

[The experts consensus on the classification, diagnosis and non-surgical treatment of cervical spondylisis(2018)].

Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Surgery

СтатьяConsensus StatementПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Cervical spine surgery with many focus and heated topics has gained increasing attention in the field of spine surgery. The surgical treatment has been widely adopted for routine treatment of cervical spondylosis in the various hospitals. According to the progressive research in recent years, the Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Surgery convened related experts and organized in-depth discussions to standardize the diagonosis, classification and non-surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis, based on the summary of symposiums focusing on cervical spine, published in Chinese Journal of Surgery in 1984, 1992 and 2008 respectively. The consensus was finally reached following the summary of the basic concepts and controversial issues, which included increased accuracy in the definition and treatment principles of cervical spondylosis. In this consensus, the revision and modification of the classification and diagnostic criteria of cervical spondylosis was concerned as well as the basic principles and methods of non-surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis.This consensus only provides academic guidance.

Для цитирования: Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Surgery. [The experts consensus on the classification, diagnosis and non-surgical treatment of cervical spondylisis(2018)].. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]. 2018. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.06.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.