Journal of bodywork and movement therapies · 2025
Effect of segmental control program on hamstring peak torque, pain and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abdelazeim Alshaymaa S, Elhafez Haytham M, Abdullah Hend H, Essa Shimaa A, Zahran Magda R
Аннотация
AIM: To investigate how a segmental control program impacts hamstring peak torque, pain, as well as functional disability in individuals suffering from Non-specific low back pain.
DESIGN: Single masking, pre-post randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: NSLBP patients from the Outpatient Clinic at Faculty of Physical Therapy, Giza, Egypt.
METHODS: 60 patients with NSLBP were randomized into three groups utilizing an opaque sealed envelope. Group "A" (closed kinetic chain), Group "B" (open kinetic chain) and Group "C" (control): all groups were receiving the conventional therapy. Treatment was applied 3 times a week for successive four weeks. The patient's pre and post-treatment evaluation was done utilizing an isokinetic dynamometer, visual analogue scale (VAS) in addition to Oswestry Disability Index for hamstring peak torque, pain intensity and functional disability.
RESULTS: Multiple pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences among pre and post-treatment in all variables in the 3 groups, closed kinetic, open kinetic and control group as p-value <0.05. Between groups analysis revealed that there were no statistical significant differences among closed and open segmental control groups while post treatment, a statistical significant differences (p-value<0.05) was observed among closed kinetic and control as well as between open kinetic and control group.
CONCLUSION: In patients suffering from non-specific low back pain, both open as well as closed kinetic chain exercises had a beneficial effect on pain and functional disability.
DESIGN: Single masking, pre-post randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: NSLBP patients from the Outpatient Clinic at Faculty of Physical Therapy, Giza, Egypt.
METHODS: 60 patients with NSLBP were randomized into three groups utilizing an opaque sealed envelope. Group "A" (closed kinetic chain), Group "B" (open kinetic chain) and Group "C" (control): all groups were receiving the conventional therapy. Treatment was applied 3 times a week for successive four weeks. The patient's pre and post-treatment evaluation was done utilizing an isokinetic dynamometer, visual analogue scale (VAS) in addition to Oswestry Disability Index for hamstring peak torque, pain intensity and functional disability.
RESULTS: Multiple pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences among pre and post-treatment in all variables in the 3 groups, closed kinetic, open kinetic and control group as p-value <0.05. Between groups analysis revealed that there were no statistical significant differences among closed and open segmental control groups while post treatment, a statistical significant differences (p-value<0.05) was observed among closed kinetic and control as well as between open kinetic and control group.
CONCLUSION: In patients suffering from non-specific low back pain, both open as well as closed kinetic chain exercises had a beneficial effect on pain and functional disability.