Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024
Construct validity and reliability of the Assessment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Raynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) questionnaire.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pauling John D, Yu Lan, Frech Tracy M, Herrick Ariane L, Hummers Laura K, Shah Ami A, Denton Christopher P, Saketkoo Lesley Ann, Withey Jane, Khanna Dinesh, Domsic Robyn T
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Assessment of construct validity and reliability of a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for assessing the severity and impact of RP in SSc.
METHODS: An international multicentre study validation study of the 27-item Assessment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Raynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) and 10-item short-form (ASRAP-SF) questionnaires. The relationship between ASRAP questionnaires and demographics, clinical phenotype and legacy instruments for assessing SSc-RP severity, disability and pain was assessed. Repeatability was evaluated at 1 week. Anchor-based statements of health status facilitated assessment of ASRAP thresholds of meaning.
RESULTS: A total of 420 SSc subjects were enrolled. There was good correlation between ASRAP (and ASRAP-SF) with RP visual analogue scale (VAS) and Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire RP VAS (rho range 0.648-0.727, P < 0.001). Correlation with diary-based assessment of SSc-RP attack frequency and duration was lower (rho range 0.258-0.504, P < 0.001). ASRAP questionnaires had good correlation with instruments for assessing disability, hand function, pain and global health assessment (rho range 0.427-0.575, P < 0.001). Significantly higher ASRAP scores were identified in smokers, patients with active digital ulceration (DU), previous history of DU and calcinosis (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). There was excellent repeatability at 1 week among patients with stable SSc-RP symptoms (intra-class coefficients of 0.891 and 0.848, P < 0.001). Patient-acceptable symptom state thresholds for ASRAP and ASRAP-SF were 45.34 and 45.77, respectively. A preliminary Minimally Important Clinical Difference threshold of 4.17 (95% CI 0.53, 7.81, P = 0.029) was estimated.
CONCLUSION: ASRAP and ASRAP-SF questionnaires are valid and reliable novel PRO instruments for assessing the severity and impact of SSc-RP.
METHODS: An international multicentre study validation study of the 27-item Assessment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Raynaud's Phenomenon (ASRAP) and 10-item short-form (ASRAP-SF) questionnaires. The relationship between ASRAP questionnaires and demographics, clinical phenotype and legacy instruments for assessing SSc-RP severity, disability and pain was assessed. Repeatability was evaluated at 1 week. Anchor-based statements of health status facilitated assessment of ASRAP thresholds of meaning.
RESULTS: A total of 420 SSc subjects were enrolled. There was good correlation between ASRAP (and ASRAP-SF) with RP visual analogue scale (VAS) and Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire RP VAS (rho range 0.648-0.727, P < 0.001). Correlation with diary-based assessment of SSc-RP attack frequency and duration was lower (rho range 0.258-0.504, P < 0.001). ASRAP questionnaires had good correlation with instruments for assessing disability, hand function, pain and global health assessment (rho range 0.427-0.575, P < 0.001). Significantly higher ASRAP scores were identified in smokers, patients with active digital ulceration (DU), previous history of DU and calcinosis (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). There was excellent repeatability at 1 week among patients with stable SSc-RP symptoms (intra-class coefficients of 0.891 and 0.848, P < 0.001). Patient-acceptable symptom state thresholds for ASRAP and ASRAP-SF were 45.34 and 45.77, respectively. A preliminary Minimally Important Clinical Difference threshold of 4.17 (95% CI 0.53, 7.81, P = 0.029) was estimated.
CONCLUSION: ASRAP and ASRAP-SF questionnaires are valid and reliable novel PRO instruments for assessing the severity and impact of SSc-RP.