Letter to the editor on"comparison of locking plate and conservative treatment in elderly patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures".

We discuss the study by Uğur Bezirgan et al., titled "Comparison of Locking Plate and Conservative Treatment in Elderly Patients with Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures." The authors are commended for their prospective study, which offers valuable insights into the comparison of locking plate fixation and conservative treatment. The study found no significant difference in functional recovery between the two groups; however, the locking plate group exhibited a higher incidence of complications. We express concerns regarding the potential selection bias arising from the non-randomized allocation of treatments and suggest that not all elderly patients may be suitable candidates for the locking plate fixation approach. Furthermore, the study highlights a lack of patient feedback regarding quality of life, and we recommend that future research incorporate subjective evaluations to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the treatment's effectiveness.