DOI 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.12.014
Total knee replacement on more than 20° valgus: A case control study.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Lower-limb valgus deformity exceeding 20° is a particular case, with few publications assessing the impact of the severity of the valgus. The present retrospective case control study compared a series of>20° valgus versus a series of 10-20° valgus, assessing (1) operative data [approach, type of total knee replacement (TKR)], (2) complications and implant survival, and (3) clinical and radiological results.
HYPOTHESIS: Severe valgus deformity requires TKR with greater constraint, incurring a higher rate of complications and poorer implant survival.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: A multicenter retrospective study for the period January 2006 to December 2010 included 53 patients, with a mean age of 72±10 years, presenting>20° valgus. The study series was matched for age and gender with a series of 53 cases of 10-20° valgus. Convexity laxity was greater in the>20° group (p=0.004).
RESULTS
There was no significant inter-group difference in approach (p=0.13). Greater constraint was more frequent in the>20° group (7/53 versus 1/53; p=0.03), independently of convexity laxity or Krackow grade (p=0.14). There were 7 complications (13.2%) in the>20° group and 7 in the 10-20° group (NS). Eight-year survivorship was 95.12% in the>20° group and 94.9% in the 10-20° group (p=0.63). There were no significant differences in Oxford score (p=0.30) or HKA angle (p=0.78) at last follow-up.
CONCLUSION
The study hypothesis was partially confirmed: greater constraint was more frequent in>20° valgus. The number of complications was low, and survival was identical to that of a control group with less severe deformity.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospectivecase controlstudy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.