DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.01.008
Uncommon antinuclear antibody patterns as diagnostic indicators.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
The clinical significance of common antinuclear antibody (ANA) patterns, such as nuclear homogenous and nuclear speckled patterns with their corresponding specific antibodies, has already been established. However, the clinical relevance of these uncommon ANA patterns have not been well elucidated and these patterns are therefore not reported by most clinical laboratories. We herein report some retrospective data analysis linking patients' clinical status to several uncommon ANA patterns.
METHODS
We retrieved and assessed the patient records for ANA reports generated in our hospital over a period of two years. All testing had been performed using the gold standard Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay.
RESULTS
Records of 1235 consecutive patients tested for ANA were reviewed. ANA was positive in 330 of these patients with 6.39% found to have uncommon nuclear, cytoplasmic or mitotic sub-patterns. The mitotic spindle (0.89%), cytoplasmic anti-mitochondrial antibodies (0.80%), followed by discrete nuclear dots-multiple (0.72%) were the dominating patterns, with a higher prevalence in females than in males. Systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis were the two most common autoimmune disorders associated with mitotic spindle fibers and nuclear centromere and nuclear large/coarse speckled ANA patterns.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of these relatively uncommon ANA patterns was higher than expected. Further evaluation of these patterns along with their corresponding antibodies and their clinical utility must be encouraged. We trust this endeavour will provide diagnostic information in autoimmune and other disease conditions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.