MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3899/jrheum.161583

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of rheumatology · 2017

Development and Validation of MRI Sacroiliac Joint Scoring Methods for the Semiaxial Scan Plane Corresponding to the Berlin and SPARCC MRI Scoring Methods, and of a New Global MRI Sacroiliac Joint Method.

Hededal Pernille, Østergaard Mikkel, Sørensen Inge Juul, Loft Anne Gitte, Hindrup Jens S, Thamsborg Gorm, Asmussen Karsten, Hendricks Oliver, Nørregaard Jesper, Møller Jakob M, Jurik Anne Grethe, Morsel Lone, Balding Lone, Pedersen Susanne Juhl

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To develop semiaxial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring methods for assessment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) bone marrow edema (BME) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis, and to compare the reliability with equivalent semicoronal scoring methods.

METHODS

Two semiaxial SIJ MRI scoring methods were developed based on the principles of the semicoronal Berlin and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) methods. A global quadrant-based method was also developed. Baseline and 12-week MRI of the SIJ from 51 patients participating in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of adalimumab 40 mg every other week versus placebo were scored by the semiaxial and the corresponding semicoronal methods. Results were compared by linear regression analysis. The reproducibility and sensitivity were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and smallest detectable change [SDC, absolute values and percentage of the highest observed score (SDC-HOS)].

RESULTS

Interreader and intrareader ICC were moderate to very high for semiaxial scoring methods (baseline 0.83-0.88 and 0.85-0.97; change 0.33-0.78), while high to very high for semicoronal scoring methods (baseline 0.90-0.92 and 0.93-0.97; change 0.77-0.89). Association between semiaxial and semicoronal scores were high for both the Berlin and SPARCC method (baseline: R2 = 0.93 and 0.88; change: R2 = 0.82 and 0.87, respectively), while lower for the global method (baseline: R2 = 0.79; change: R2 = 0.54). The SDC-HOS were 9.8-18.6% and 5.9-10.7% for the semiaxial and semicoronal methods, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Detection of SIJ BME in the semiaxial scan plane is feasible and reproducible. However, a slightly lower reliability of all 3 semiaxial methods supports the general practice of using the coronal scan-plane in therapeutic studies.

Для цитирования: Hededal Pernille, Østergaard Mikkel, Sørensen Inge Juul, Loft Anne Gitte, Hindrup Jens S, Thamsborg Gorm, Asmussen Karsten, Hendricks Oliver, Nørregaard Jesper, Møller Jakob M, Jurik Anne Grethe, Morsel Lone, Balding Lone, Pedersen Susanne Juhl. Development and Validation of MRI Sacroiliac Joint Scoring Methods for the Semiaxial Scan Plane Corresponding to the Berlin and SPARCC MRI Scoring Methods, and of a New Global MRI Sacroiliac Joint Method.. The Journal of rheumatology. 2017. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.161583.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.