Comparison of hip subregion bone mineral density to the type of proximal femur fracture.

UNLABELLED: Beta values of the intertrochanteric fracture group were about twice as high as those of the femoral neck fracture group. These results can be used to increase the awareness of proximal hip fracture among physicians and improve treatments and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare the BMD of the femoral neck region and the intertrochanteric region between the femoral neck fracture group and the intertrochanteric fracture group.

METHODS

We did a retrospective review of radiographs of the proximal femoral fractures in patients registered from 2010 to 2017. A total of 329 patients were classified into the femoral neck fracture group (group A, n = 162) and the femur intertrochanteric fracture group (group B, n = 167). We did intergroup comparisons of age, sex, BMI (body mass index), and bone mineral density (BMD) of the neck and intertrochanteric region, adjusting for age. We did multiple logistic regression analysis among these parameters.

RESULTS

The BMD of the femoral neck and intertrochanteric was statistically significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.001), and the BMD of the femur intertrochanteric was also significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.001). BMD of both regions in the intertrochanteric fracture group was lower than that of the femoral neck fracture group. In linear regression analysis, the beta values of the intertrochanteric fracture group were about twice as high as those of the femoral neck fracture group.

CONCLUSION

In linear regression analysis, the beta values of the intertrochanteric fracture group were about twice as high as those of the femoral neck fracture group.