Coracoid bone graft resorption after Latarjet procedure is underestimated: a new classification system and a clinical review with computed tomography evaluation.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
This study proposes a simple and reliable classification system to evaluate the severity of the bone resorption of the transferred coracoid bone block after the Latarjet procedure. The incidence and severity of the graft resorption was also investigated.
METHODS
Between January 2009 and January 2012, 63 patients underwent an open Latarjet procedure and were included. Four independent surgeons used the classification system we proposed to evaluate the severity of the graft resorption on the computed tomography scan performed 1 year postoperatively. Each surgeon did the evaluation twice at a 3-month interval. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification system were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Among these 63 patients, 57 patients were available for clinical evaluation at 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant-Murley score, and Rowe score were improved significantly after the surgery. No redislocation occurred during follow-up. The incidence of graft resorption was 90.5% based on the computed tomography evaluation. The coracoid graft resorption was classified as grade 0 in 6 patients, grade I in 26, grade II in 25, and grade III in 6. The classification system had excellent interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
CONCLUSION
The open Latarjet procedure is effective in treating anterior shoulder instability with marked glenoid bone loss. The incidence of the graft resorption at 1 year postoperatively is high. Our classification system on the graft resorption after Latarjet procedure has good interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.