Efficacy of cervical epidural steroid injection with or without local anesthetic on pain and disability.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Cervical epidural injections are frequently applied in the treatment of radicular pain caused by cervical disc herniation. This study aimed to investigate and compare the effectiveness of cervical epidural steroid injection and cervical epidural steroid + bupivacaine injection using Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores.
METHODS
A total of 91 patients were included in the study. Patients who received cervical epidural steroid and cervical epidural steroid + bupivacaine were classified as Group I and Group II, respectively. Demographic characteristics, pain duration, and baseline VAS (VAS0) and NDI (NDI0) scores were recorded. Patients were also evaluated at the first and sixth months, and VAS1, NDI1, VAS6, and NDI6 scores were assessed.
RESULTS
Demographic characteristics and mean pain durations of the groups were similar, and VAS and NDI scores did not differ significantly at baseline, the first, and sixth months. Within each group, the VAS6 score was significantly lower than VAS0 (p=0.01) and VAS1 (p=0.01) scores, while the NDI6 score was also significantly lower than NDI0 (p=0.01) and NDI1 (p=0.01) scores in Group I. Similarly, the VAS3 score was significantly lower than VAS0 (p=0.01) and VAS1 (p=0.01) scores, and the NDI3 score was significantly lower than NDI0 (p=0.01) and NDI1 (p=0.01) scores in Group II.
CONCLUSION
Our findings showed that the combination of epidural steroid + bupivacaine in cervical interlaminar epidural injections yields similar clinical effects to those of steroid alone, providing comparable improvement in functional status.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.