The significance of perivascular inflammation in the absence of arteritis in temporal artery biopsy specimens.

We retrospectively compared 81 temporal artery biopsy specimens demonstrating perivascular inflammation without evidence of temporal arteritis and 76 specimens demonstrating no inflammation. Patients with perivascular inflammation included 43 women (mean age, 71.2 years). Nineteen patients met the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. All patients demonstrated chronic perivascular inflammation consisting primarily of lymphocytes. Granulomas were noted in 4 specimens. Internal elastic lamina disruption, intimal fibroplasia, and dystrophic calcification were noted in 86 arteries examined. Fibrosis or scarring of the vessel walls was observed in 10 specimens. Corticosteroid therapy was beneficial to 33 of 56 patients. In patients with no evidence of inflammation (50 women; mean age, 66.6 years), 21 met ACR criteria for temporal arteritis. Histologically, disruption of the elastic lamina was noted in 75 of 81 arteries biopsied, intimal fibroplasia in 66, microcalcifications in 5, and fibrosis or scarring in 5. In this group, 47 patients received corticosteroid therapy; clinical improvement was noted in 28. Patients with chronic perivascular inflammation but no arteritis seem no more likely to have temporal arteritis on clinical grounds than similar patients without inflammation on biopsy.