Design and Validation of a Computer Application for Diagnosis of Shoulder Locomotor System Pathology.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To design and validate a computer application for the diagnosis of shoulder locomotor system pathology.
METHODS
The first phase involved the construction of the application using the Delphi method. In the second phase, the application was validated with a sample of 250 patients with shoulder pathology. Validity was measured for each diagnostic group using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR(+) and LR(-)). The correct classification ratio (CCR) for each patient and the factors related to worse classification were calculated using multivariate binary logistic regression (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval).
RESULTS
The mean time to complete the application was 15 ± 7 minutes. The validity values were the following: LR(+) 7.8 and LR(-) 0.1 for cervical radiculopathy, LR(+) 4.1 and LR(-) 0.4 for glenohumeral arthrosis, LR(+) 15.5 and LR(-) 0.2 for glenohumeral instability, LR(+) 17.2 and LR(-) 0.2 for massive rotator cuff tear, LR(+) 6.2 and LR(-) 0.2 for capsular syndrome, LR(+) 4.0 and LR(-) 0.3 for subacromial impingement/rotator cuff tendinopathy, and LR(+) 2.5 and LR(-) 0.6 for acromioclavicular arthropathy. A total of 70% of the patients had a CCR greater than 85%. Factors that negatively affected accuracy were massive rotator cuff tear, acromioclavicular arthropathy, age over 55 years, and high pain intensity (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The developed application achieved an acceptable validity for most pathologies. Because the tool had a limited capacity to identify the full clinical picture in the same patient, improvements and new studies applied to other groups of patients are required.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.