Pyoderma gangrenosum mimicking inflammatory breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common injuries. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) are the most diffused between surgical treatments. Carbon-fiber reinforced (CFR) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) plates have been proposed to prevent effects linked to stainless steel or titanium alloy traditional plates, such as radio-opacity, mismatch of bone-plate elasticity modulus, corrosion, limited fatigue life, osseointegration.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to evaluate the actual safety and reliability of CFR- PEEK plates to treat distal radius fractures.

METHODS

Electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholars, and Cochrane Library were searched in December 2020. Eligible studies were published in peer-reviewed journals. Three authors independently selected relevant articles and discussed those. Searching identified 13 titles and abstracts, 11 manuscripts were considered eligible for the full-text analysis. Of these 11 papers, 7 studies were included in our review.

RESULTS

215 patients were analyzed in this systematic review. The mean age of enrolled patients was 52,8 years. 34% were males and 66% were females. Fractures were classified according to AO/ASIF classification system. We reported 12 cases of complications specific to this device, such as intraoperative plate and screws rupture, erosive flexor tendons synovitis, and loosening.

CONCLUSION

CFR-PEEK distal radius plates are potentially an alternative to traditional ones. But we believe that the use of this device does not entail a significant advantage in the treatment of distal radius fractures, as safe and low-cost traditional devices are available. Further comparative studies are needed to demonstrate the superiority of carbon devices.