Manual therapy · 2015
Validation of the pectoralis minor length test: A novel approach.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weber Christian, Enzler Marcel, Wieser Karl, Swanenburg Jaap
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Pectoralis minor (PM) shortness is believed to promote faulty shoulder mechanics including reduced scapular posterior tilt. A pectoralis minor length (PML) test that measures the acromion-table distance with and without manual pressure on the coracoid process is supposed to examine the passive mechanical properties of the PM. A threshold for "shortening" has been set at 2.6 cm, but data regarding its validity are lacking. We hypothesized that, under conditions of good reliability, an evaluation of the effect of PM tenotomy, could adequately investigate the construct validity of this test.
METHODS: Sixteen subjects with anterior shoulder instability who were undergoing open Latarjet procedures were recruited. We performed the PML test with and without pressure (1) in a clinical setting to check for intratester reliability and setting comparability and (2) in an intraoperative setting immediately before and after PM tenotomy to assess the construct validity.
RESULTS: The PML test exhibited excellent intra-tester reliability (intracorrelation coefficients, ICC > 0.94) and reasonable setting comparability (ICC 0.31-0.54). The change following intraoperative PM tenotomy was significant (p < .008) but small (mean = 0.46-0.50 cm) compared to the measurement variability (standard deviation 1.0-1.5 cm). In 12 of the 16 subjects, the measurements remained above the threshold of 2.6 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: The influence of the PM on the PML test seems to be minor compared to other factors that cause high measurement variability. A threshold of 2.6 cm cannot distinguish between short and normal PMs. Our findings suggest that the impact of the PM on restricted scapular posterior tilt might be smaller than believed.
METHODS: Sixteen subjects with anterior shoulder instability who were undergoing open Latarjet procedures were recruited. We performed the PML test with and without pressure (1) in a clinical setting to check for intratester reliability and setting comparability and (2) in an intraoperative setting immediately before and after PM tenotomy to assess the construct validity.
RESULTS: The PML test exhibited excellent intra-tester reliability (intracorrelation coefficients, ICC > 0.94) and reasonable setting comparability (ICC 0.31-0.54). The change following intraoperative PM tenotomy was significant (p < .008) but small (mean = 0.46-0.50 cm) compared to the measurement variability (standard deviation 1.0-1.5 cm). In 12 of the 16 subjects, the measurements remained above the threshold of 2.6 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: The influence of the PM on the PML test seems to be minor compared to other factors that cause high measurement variability. A threshold of 2.6 cm cannot distinguish between short and normal PMs. Our findings suggest that the impact of the PM on restricted scapular posterior tilt might be smaller than believed.