DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.037
Comparison of In Vivo Stiffness of Tendons Commonly Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Shear Wave Elastography Study.
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES
There are currently no studies investigating the in vivo stiffness of the most commonly used autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using Shear wave elastography (SWE). We hypothesize that there are differences regarding the elastic properties between the three tendons commonly used for ACLR and that they are influenced by patient-related factors.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
80 healthy subjects (25 females, 55 males, age: 25.33 ± 4.76 years, BMI: 23.76 ± 3.14 kg/m2, 40 semiprofessional athletes, athlete group [AG], age: 25.51 [19-29]; 40 healthy controls, control group [CG], age: 25.50 [20-29]) were recruited as participants. In addition to patient reported outcome scores, every participant underwent a standardized multimodal ultrasound protocol consisting of B-mode-ultrasound (B-US), Color Doppler-ultrasound (CD-US) and a SWE examination of the bilateral quadriceps tendon (QT), patellar tendon (PT) and semitendinosus tendon (ST).
RESULTS
The highest shear wave velocity (SWV) were observed in ST (4.88 (4.35-5.52) m/s, ST vs QT, p = 0.005; ST vs PT, p < 0.001) followed by QT (4.61 (4.13-5.26) m/s, QT vs PT, p < 0.001) and PT (3.73 (3.30-4.68) m/s). Median QT, PT and ST stiffness was significantly higher in AG compared to CG. Male subjects tend to have stiffer QT and PT than female subjects. Positive correlation with SWV was obtained for age and activity level.
CONCLUSION
There are significant differences regarding in vivo tendon stiffness between the most frequently used autograft tendon options for ACLR. The quantitative information obtained by SWE could be of particular interest for graft choice for ACLR.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.