DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/keac675
Crystalline silica exposure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Develop and validate a thorough exposure questionnaire to comprehensively explore crystalline silica (SiO2) exposure in the general population (gender-specific, occupational and non-occupational) and in patients with autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc)).
METHODS
Lifetime exposures to SiO2 in occupational and non-occupational settings were assessed using a thorough exposure questionnaire. The questionnaire was applied to a general population panel (n = 2911) sampled from the French rolling census, and to unselected patients with SSc (n = 100) and RA (n = 97). Global (GES), occupational (OES) and non-occupational (NOES) exposure scores were assessed in SSc and RA patients, and compared with up to four controls from the general population, matched by age group, sex and tobacco consumption.
RESULTS
Patients had higher GES than their matched controls (SSc: P = 0.001; RA: P < 0.0001) due to higher OES (P < 0.0001 for SSc and RA). Men had higher GES than women (SSc: P < 0.0001; RA: P = 0.002) due to higher OES (P < 0.0001 for SSc and RA). The NOES did not differ between men and women. In SSc patients: Men had higher GES than controls (P < 0.0001). Men and women with SSc had higher OES than controls (P < 0.0001). In RA patients: GES and OES were higher in both men (P = 0.00521; P < 0.0001) and women (P < 0.0001; P < 0.0001) than in their respective controls. Women had higher NOES than controls (P = 0.045).
CONCLUSION
The lifetime SiO2 exposure gap between RA and SSc patients and controls was substantially due to occupational exposure. In both diseases, men had higher exposure scores than women.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.