Journal of dance medicine & science : official publication of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science · 2025
Low Back Pain and Dance: A quantitative Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Imhof Roman, Fischer Thomas, Becker Daniela
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Lower back pain (LBP) is a common issue among dancers across various styles. This study aims to investigate the 12-month prevalence, level of disability, duration and frequency of LBP episodes in a sample of dancers engaged in different dance styles. Additionally, it seeks to identify risk factors for low back pain, including dance style, sociodemographic factors, and psychosocial factors.
METHODS: A survey was conducted via an online questionnaire utilizing www.SoSciSurvey.de. 77 dancers aged between 14 and 45 years, who danced at least 1 hour per week on average, were included. The sample comprised both recreational and professional dancers, exhibiting a wide range of workloads. Participants conveyed their sociodemographic Information, parameters related to their dancing and their 12-month prevalence of LBP including the duration and frequency of LBP episodes. To assess the degree of LBP induced disability, participants completed the Oswestry disability Index (ODI). A Chi-squared Test (Prevalence), Kruskal-Wallis Test (H-test), and Spearman correlation (confounders) were conducted.
RESULTS: The 12-month prevalence of LBP in the cohort was high with 83.1%. The dance style did not have a statistically significant impact on the 12-month prevalence (P = .844) and the ODI (P = .065). Satisfaction with their own dance performance, coaching staff and the dance group, as well as heavy manual labor, smoking and psychological comorbidities were all statistically significantly correlated with at least 1 of the outcomes (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Psychosocial factors, psychological comorbidities, and lifestyle factors such as occupation and smoking status impacted LBP. Dance style did not affect LBP significantly.
METHODS: A survey was conducted via an online questionnaire utilizing www.SoSciSurvey.de. 77 dancers aged between 14 and 45 years, who danced at least 1 hour per week on average, were included. The sample comprised both recreational and professional dancers, exhibiting a wide range of workloads. Participants conveyed their sociodemographic Information, parameters related to their dancing and their 12-month prevalence of LBP including the duration and frequency of LBP episodes. To assess the degree of LBP induced disability, participants completed the Oswestry disability Index (ODI). A Chi-squared Test (Prevalence), Kruskal-Wallis Test (H-test), and Spearman correlation (confounders) were conducted.
RESULTS: The 12-month prevalence of LBP in the cohort was high with 83.1%. The dance style did not have a statistically significant impact on the 12-month prevalence (P = .844) and the ODI (P = .065). Satisfaction with their own dance performance, coaching staff and the dance group, as well as heavy manual labor, smoking and psychological comorbidities were all statistically significantly correlated with at least 1 of the outcomes (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Psychosocial factors, psychological comorbidities, and lifestyle factors such as occupation and smoking status impacted LBP. Dance style did not affect LBP significantly.