MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1021/acsptsci.2c00140

Медицинская библиотека · ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2022

Controversial Role of Folic Acid on Diabetic Auditory Neuropathy.

Doostkam Aida, Mirkhani Hossein, Iravani Kamyar, Karbalay-Doust Saied, Doosti Afsaneh, Nadimi Elham, Pirsalami Fatema

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Diabetic auditory neuropathy (DAN) is a common complication of diabetes that seriously affects the quality of life in patients. In this study, we investigate the role of folic acid in the treatment of DAN in an experimental rat model.

METHODS

Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were equally divided into four groups: group 1, normal; group 2, diabetic rats; and groups 3 and 4, diabetic rats treated with folic acid (40 and 80 mg/kg, respectively). We used some tools to investigate the therapeutic effect of folic acid on DAN. We evaluated auditory brain stem response (ABR), estimated the volume and number of spiral ganglion and the volume of stria vascularis and spiral ligament by the stereological method, and measured the blood levels of homocysteine (HCY), malondialdehyde (MDA), and superoxide dismutase (SOD).

RESULTS

Our study showed that folic acid treatment was not significantly effective in improving structural and functional disorders in DAN, even though its effectiveness in reducing HCY (P < 0.001) and MDA (P < 0.05) as oxidative biomarkers was significant.

CONCLUSION

Folic acid is not effective in relieving morphological and functional disorders in DAN.

Для цитирования: Doostkam Aida, Mirkhani Hossein, Iravani Kamyar, Karbalay-Doust Saied, Doosti Afsaneh, Nadimi Elham, Pirsalami Fatema. Controversial Role of Folic Acid on Diabetic Auditory Neuropathy.. ACS pharmacology & translational science. 2022. DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.2c00140.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.