Straight and helical plating with locking plates for proximal humeral shaft fractures - a biomechanical comparison under physiological load conditions.

OBJECTIVES

Helical plating is an established method for treating proximal humeral shaft fractures, mitigating the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve damage. However, biomechanical test data on helical plates under physiological load condition is limited. Hence, the aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of helical and straight PHILOS® Long plates in AO12C2 fractures using static and cyclic implant system testing.

METHODS

Helical and straight PHILOS® Long plates on artificial bone substitutes were tested under physiological axial static (n=6) and cyclic loading (n=12). The axial construct stiffness was the main parameter for comparing the biomechanical performance of the two groups. Mimicking a clinical scenario, the helical deformation was performed consecutively by an experienced surgeon using iron bending tools. The torsional angle was determined computationally from 3D-scanning models afterwards.

RESULTS

Helical plating resulted in a significantly reduced axial construct stiffness in all test scenarios compared to conventional straight plating (static testing: p=0.012; cyclic testing: p≤0.010). No failure occurred within the range of physiological loading in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Helical plating favors multidimensional deformation of the test sample in lateral-ventral direction under axial loading, resulting in a reduced axial construct stiffness and in an increased interfragmentary movement. No biomechanical failure is to be expected within physiological load boundaries.