MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.52628/87.4.17

Медицинская библиотека · Acta orthopaedica Belgica · 2021

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the pes anserinus bursa with secondary involvement of a reconstructed autologous anterior cruciate ligament - A case report.

Van Oost Loïc, Sinnaeve Friedl

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a family of lesions most often arising from the synovium of joints, bursae and tendon sheaths. It is composed of synovial- like mononuclear cells, admixed with multinucleate giant cells, foam cells, siderophages and inflammatory cells (1). It can have various clinical manifestations, and is therefore subdivided in a diffuse and a localized/ nodular subtype. Furthermore, the lesions can have an intra- or extra-articular location. The purpose of this paper is to present the case of a 41-year-old male suffering from multifocal extra- and intra-articular TGCT of the right knee, with involvement of the pes anserinus bursa and an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) autograft respectively. The ACL reconstruction was performed 11 years prior to the diagnosis of the TGCT, using tendons harvested from the pes anserinus. Our case illustrates the risk of transferring TGCT from an extra- to intra-articular location during ACL reconstruction, when using tendons of a pes anserinus prone to develop this condition. To our knowledge, no similar case was published in the literature so far.

Для цитирования: Van Oost Loïc, Sinnaeve Friedl. Tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the pes anserinus bursa with secondary involvement of a reconstructed autologous anterior cruciate ligament - A case report.. Acta orthopaedica Belgica. 2021. DOI: 10.52628/87.4.17.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.