Evaluation of Extensor Mechanism in Revision Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND

The success of revision total knee arthroplasty depends on adequate exposure that does not produce complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of revision total knee arthroplasty between V-Y quadricepsplasty (QP) and quadriceps snip (QS) approaches.

METHODS

In the study, 92 knees with follow-up of 12-108 months which were operated by using QP (55) and QS (37) were evaluated retrospectively. Measurements were taken by using universal transparent goniometer, also varus valgus deformities, knee flexion angles, instability, Hospital for Special Surgery and Lower Extremity Functional Scale scores, functional condition of the knee and activity levels of the patients were evaluated cross-sectionally.

RESULTS

Statistically significant difference was not found regarding extensor restriction, varus or valgus deformities, knee flexion angles, flexor and extensor muscular strength, Hospital for Special Surgery and Lower Extremity Functional Scale score (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

QP is a preferable method which allows a wider arthrotomy for stiff knees and revision knee surgery, and provides larger access to the joint. Choosing this incision does not bring disadvantage in terms of extensor mechanism.