MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua nei ke za zhi · 2013

[The re-evaluation of 140 patients diagnosed as ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis].

Jin Di-er, Zhao Li-dan, Yan Xiao-ping, Hao Dong-lin, Liu Jing, Zhao Yan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To re-evaluate the diagnoses of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and analyze the incidence and reason of misdiagnosis.

METHODS

Patients who were previously diagnosed as AS and nr-axSpA before referrals to Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) were re-evaluated by three rheumatologists of PUMCH according to the modified New York criteria for AS and Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) axial SpA classification criteria for nr-axSpA.

RESULTS

Totally 87 prior AS patients and 53 prior nr-axSpA patients were enrolled in this study. After re-evaluation, 57 patients were still diagnosed as AS and 16 patients were still diagnosed as nr-axSpA. The misdiagnosis incidences were 34.48% and 69.81%, respectively. The misdiagnosis incidence of nr-axSpA was higher than that of AS (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The misdiagnosis of AS were mainly due to the misjudgment of sacroiliac joints by CT. The misdiagnosis of nr-axSpA were mainly due to the misjudgment of sacroiliac joints by magnetic resonance imaging. Moreover, the misuse of ASAS axial SpA classification criteria contributed to the misdiagnosis also.

Для цитирования: Jin Di-er, Zhao Li-dan, Yan Xiao-ping, Hao Dong-lin, Liu Jing, Zhao Yan. [The re-evaluation of 140 patients diagnosed as ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis].. Zhonghua nei ke za zhi. 2013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.