MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2026.125286

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2026

Advances in Materials and Technologies for Cranioplasty: A Narrative Review.

Wang Haobo, Zhao Tianquan, Zhu Shu, Luo Peiyuan, Huang Linxi, Li Zujian, Yu Kai, Wen Lan, Xia Xun

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Cranioplasty is a key reconstructive procedure for restoring cranial integrity, protecting intracranial structures, and enhancing neurological, psychological, and aesthetic outcomes after skull defects. At present, the selection of repair material remains clinically challenging, given that no single material comprehensively fulfills the requirements of mechanical stability, biocompatibility, osseointegration, imaging compatibility, infection resistance, cost-effectiveness, and long-term safety.

METHODS

This narrative review was based on a targeted literature search of Google Scholar, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, with an emphasis on recent clinical evidence and emerging translational strategies for materials used in cranial defect repair.

RESULTS

This review summarizes current advances in cranioplasty materials, encompassing autologous bone, titanium, polymethyl methacrylate, polyether ether ketone, degradable polymers, bioceramics, and bioactive composite scaffolds. Conventional materials remain widely utilized owing to their established clinical performance. However, their applications are limited by several complications. These include bone resorption, infection, implant exposure, mechanical mismatch, and insufficient biological integration. Recent advances have been made in CAD/CAM, three-dimensional printing, surface modification, controlled delivery of bioactive factors, and tissue-engineered scaffolds. These advances have promoted a shift from passive defect coverage toward patient-specific and regenerative reconstruction strategies. However, most emerging strategies are primarily supported by preclinical or heterogeneous clinical evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies should prioritize indication-based material selection, standardized outcome assessment, long-term follow-up, and multicenter validation to guide the development of safer and more functional cranioplasty materials.

Для цитирования: Wang Haobo, Zhao Tianquan, Zhu Shu, Luo Peiyuan, Huang Linxi, Li Zujian, Yu Kai, Wen Lan, Xia Xun. Advances in Materials and Technologies for Cranioplasty: A Narrative Review.. World neurosurgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2026.125286.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.