MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/cod.14059

Медицинская библиотека · Contact dermatitis · 2022

European patch test results with audit allergens as candidates for inclusion in the European Baseline Series, 2019/20: Joint results of the ESSCAA and the EBSB working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDACC.

Uter Wolfgang, Wilkinson S Mark, Aerts Olivier, Bauer Andrea, Borrego Leopoldo, Buhl Timo, Cooper Susan M, Dickel Heinrich, Gallo Rosella, Giménez-Arnau Ana M, John Swen M, Navarini Alexander A, Pesonen Maria, Pónyai Györgyi, Rustemeyer Thomas, Schliemann Sibylle, Schubert Steffen, Schuttelaar Marie-Louise A, Valiukevičienė Skaidra, Wagner Nicola, Weisshaar Elke, Gonçalo Margarida, ESSCA and EBS ESCD working groups, and the GEIDAC

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In 2019, a number of allergens (haptens), henceforth, "the audit allergens," were considered as potential additions to the European Baseline Series (EBS), namely, sodium metabisulfite, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, Compositae mix II (2.5% or 5% pet), linalool hydroperoxides (lin-OOH), limonene hydroperoxides (lim-OOH), benzisothiazolinone (BIT), octylisothiazolinone (OIT), decyl glucoside, and lauryl glucoside; Evernia furfuracea (tree moss), was additionally tested by some departments as well.

OBJECTIVES

To collect further data on patch test reactivity and clinical relevance of the audit allergens in consecutive patients across Europe.

METHODS

Patch test data covering the audit allergens in 2019 and 2020 were collected by those departments of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies testing these, as well as further collaborators from the EBS working group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD), and the Spanish Grupo Español de Investigación en Dermatitis de Contacto y Alergia Cutánea. As patch test outcome, reactions between day (D) 3 and D5 were considered.

RESULTS

Altogether n = 12 403 patients were tested with any of the audit allergen. Positive reactions were most common to lin-OOH 1% pet. (8.74% [95%CI: 8.14-9.37%]), followed by lin-OOH 0.5% pet., and lim-OOH 0.3% pet (5.41% [95% CI: 4.95-5.89%]). Beyond these terpene hydroperoxides, BIT 0.1% pet. was the second most common allergen with 4.72% (95% CI: 4.2-5.28%), followed by sodium metabisulfite 1% pet. (3.75% [95%CI: 3.32-4.23%]) and Compositae mix 5% pet. (2.31% [95% CI: 1.84-2.87%]). For some allergens, clinical relevance was frequently difficult to ascertain.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite many positive patch test reactions, it remains controversial whether lin- and lim-OOH should be tested routinely, while at least the two preservatives BIT and sodium metabisulfite appear suitable. The present results are a basis for further discussion and ultimately decision on their implementation into routine testing among the ESCD members.

Для цитирования: Uter Wolfgang, Wilkinson S Mark, Aerts Olivier, Bauer Andrea, Borrego Leopoldo, Buhl Timo, Cooper Susan M, Dickel Heinrich, Gallo Rosella, Giménez-Arnau Ana M, John Swen M, Navarini Alexander A, Pesonen Maria, Pónyai Györgyi, Rustemeyer Thomas, Schliemann Sibylle, Schubert Steffen, Schuttelaar Marie-Louise A, Valiukevičienė Skaidra, Wagner Nicola, Weisshaar Elke, Gonçalo Margarida, ESSCA and EBS ESCD working groups, and the GEIDAC. European patch test results with audit allergens as candidates for inclusion in the European Baseline Series, 2019/20: Joint results of the ESSCAA and the EBSB working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDACC.. Contact dermatitis. 2022. DOI: 10.1111/cod.14059.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.