MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.01.005

Медицинская библиотека · Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2009

Arthrocentesis versus nonsurgical methods in the treatment of temporomandibular disc displacement without reduction.

Diraçoğlu Demirhan, Saral Ilknur Bayraktar, Keklik Bariş, Kurt Hanefi, Emekli Ufuk, Ozçakar Levent, Karan Ayşe, Aksoy Cihan

Сравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare the short- and medium-term results of arthrocentesis and conventional treatment (splint, heat, and exercise) in patients with early temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction (DDw/oR).

STUDY

DESIGN

One hundred twenty consecutive patients (104 female, 16 male), who had been followed by a multidisciplinary TMJ unit with the diagnosis of DDw/oR were enrolled in this single-blind prospective study. Patients either underwent arthrocentesis or they were given a combination of splint, hot pack, and home exercise program. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment. Maximal mouth opening (MMO), lateral movement, and protrusion were measured. Repeat measurements were performed on the first, third, and sixth months following treatments.

RESULTS

Arthrocentesis group consisted of 54 individuals (51 female, 3 male), and the conventional treatment group consisted of 56 individuals (49 female, 7 male). The mean age values of the groups were 33.4 years (range 15-63 years) and 34.8 years (range 17-61 years), respectively. Baseline VAS and MMO values of the arthrocentesis and conventional treatment groups were similar (P > .05). Regarding VAS and MMO, lateral movement, and protrusion, the intragroup analyses showed a statistically significant reduction in both groups compared with baseline values (all P < .01). Regarding VAS values, the difference values between each evaluation and the baseline measurement were significantly higher in the arthrocentesis group, except for the first-month difference. Regarding MMO, lateral movements, and protrusion, the differences between the baseline values and each evaluation thereafter were statistically similar between the 2 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that early treatment either with conservative methods or with arthrocentesis is beneficial in DDw/oR. However, arthrocentesis seems to be superior regarding pain management. Therefore, arthrocentesis may be indicated in patients where painful complaints overwhelm despite other conservative treatments.

Для цитирования: Diraçoğlu Demirhan, Saral Ilknur Bayraktar, Keklik Bariş, Kurt Hanefi, Emekli Ufuk, Ozçakar Levent, Karan Ayşe, Aksoy Cihan. Arthrocentesis versus nonsurgical methods in the treatment of temporomandibular disc displacement without reduction.. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.01.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.