Leg Length Discrepancy After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Clinical Assessments, Imaging Diagnostics, and Medico-Legal Implications.

BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVES

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely performed procedure to alleviate pain and improve function in patients with hip disorders. However, leg length discrepancy (LLD) remains a prevalent complication. LLD can cause gait disturbances, back pain, postural imbalance, and patient dissatisfaction, along with significant medico-legal implications. This review examines the evaluation, management, and medico-legal aspects of LLD.

METHODS

The review analyzed literature on the prevalence, evaluation methods, and management strategies for LLD in THA. Radiographic and clinical assessment tools were considered, alongside factors such as pelvic obliquity and pre-existing conditions. The importance of preoperative planning, intraoperative techniques (including computer-assisted methods), and comprehensive documentation was evaluated to address both clinical and legal challenges.

RESULTS

The review shows that leg length discrepancy (LLD) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) occurs in 3% to 30% of cases, with mean values ranging from 3 to 17 mm. LLD may result from anatomical or procedural factors, and effective evaluation requires both radiographic imaging and clinical assessment. Preoperative planning plays a critical role in accurately assessing anatomical parameters and selecting appropriate prosthetic components to preserve or restore limb length symmetry. Advanced intraoperative techniques, including computer-assisted surgery, help reduce LLD incidence. While some complications may be unavoidable, proper documentation and patient communication, particularly regarding informed consent, are essential to mitigate medico-legal risks

Conclusions

LLD after THA requires a multidimensional approach incorporating clinical, radiological, biomechanical, and legal considerations. Effective preoperative and intraoperative strategies, combined with robust communication and documentation, are essential to minimize LLD and its associated risks. A focus on precision and patient-centered care can improve outcomes and reduce litigation.