Journal of orofacial pain · 2004
The relationship between morphological changes of the condyle and condylar position in the glenoid fossa.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsuruta Akemi, Yamada Kazuhiro, Hanada Kooji, Hosogai Akiko, Kohno Shoji, Koyama Jun-ichi, Hayashi Takafumi
Аннотация
AIMS: To investigate whether condylar morphological changes influence the condyle position in the glenoid fossa as well as the amount of condylar movement from the intercuspal position (IP) to the reference position (RP).
METHODS: Helical computed tomography was used for precise measurement of the joint spaces at IP and RP in 22 subjects (mean age 22.7 years). Subjects were divided into 2 groups, those without condylar bone changes (n = 11) and those with condylar bone changes (n = 11). The latter group was further subdivided into a flattening subgroup and an osteophyte subgroup, according to the type of condylar bone change.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the width of the anterosuperior or posterosuperior joint spaces at IP between either the 2 groups or the 2 subgroups. On the other hand, during condylar movement from IP to RP, the condyles moved significantly more superiorly and posterosuperiorly in the bone-change group than in the no-bone-change group. There was also greater absolute horizontal condylar movement between IP and RP in the bone-change group. In addition, within the bone-change group, the type of condylar bone change influenced the amount of condylar movement. Joints with osteophyte formation showed the most superior, posterosuperior, and absolute horizontal movement from IP to RP.
CONCLUSION: The findings that condyles of the bone-change group, especially those with osteophyte formation, were located significantly more anteroinferiorly in the glenoid fossa at IP than RP than the condyles of the no-bone-change group suggest that condylar IP-RP positional changes might be related to condylar shape alteration.
METHODS: Helical computed tomography was used for precise measurement of the joint spaces at IP and RP in 22 subjects (mean age 22.7 years). Subjects were divided into 2 groups, those without condylar bone changes (n = 11) and those with condylar bone changes (n = 11). The latter group was further subdivided into a flattening subgroup and an osteophyte subgroup, according to the type of condylar bone change.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the width of the anterosuperior or posterosuperior joint spaces at IP between either the 2 groups or the 2 subgroups. On the other hand, during condylar movement from IP to RP, the condyles moved significantly more superiorly and posterosuperiorly in the bone-change group than in the no-bone-change group. There was also greater absolute horizontal condylar movement between IP and RP in the bone-change group. In addition, within the bone-change group, the type of condylar bone change influenced the amount of condylar movement. Joints with osteophyte formation showed the most superior, posterosuperior, and absolute horizontal movement from IP to RP.
CONCLUSION: The findings that condyles of the bone-change group, especially those with osteophyte formation, were located significantly more anteroinferiorly in the glenoid fossa at IP than RP than the condyles of the no-bone-change group suggest that condylar IP-RP positional changes might be related to condylar shape alteration.