MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Resorption Rates of Mandibular Cortical and Iliac Cancellous Bone Grafts in Alveolar Cleft Repair.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Pang Xuefei, Zhao Xinran, Yu Zuyin, Wang Huilin, Cai Ming

Аннотация

ObjectiveThe main objective of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the short-term osteogenic effects of mandibular cortex bone (MCB) versus iliac cancellous bone (ICB) after secondary alveolar bone graft.DesignRCT.SettingDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery in the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital from September 1, 2020, to August 31, 2023.PatientsPatients with unilateral alveolar cleft.InterventionsThose who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to receive either MCB or ICB grafting. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed preoperatively and immediately, as well as at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.Main Outcome Measure(s)The bone resorption rate was measured 6 months postoperatively. Clinical observations included adverse events and hospitalization details including length of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, length of stay, and costs.ResultsA total of 28 patients were included, with 16 allocated to the MCB group and 12 to the ICB group. The bone resorption rate in the MCB group (45.20 ± 29.81%) was significantly lower than that in the ICB group (74.87 ± 18.48%) (P = 0.005). Two adverse events were reported in the MCB group. The MCB group had significantly greater costs (P < 0.001), a significantly shorter length of stay (P < 0.001), and a significantly longer duration of surgery (P = 0.026). However, there were no significant differences in terms of intraoperative bleeding.ConclusionCompared with ICB, MCB demonstrated a slower bone resorption rate in the short term for treating secondary alveolar cleft in this study, albeit with increased surgical time and costs.Trial RegistrationRegistry number: ChiCTR2000034227 [URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=55737].