Comparative outcomes of PFN vs PFNA2 nailing for osteoporotic unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.

INTRODUCTION

fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures presents a significant challenge, especially in the context of osteoporosis. Intramedullary implants have been established as superior to plate constructs. Our aim is to compare the complications and clinical outcomes of the Proximal Femur Nail (PFN) and Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation-2 (PFNA2) in managing unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

a total of 212 patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent fixation of trochanteric fractures using either a standard PFN (n = 110) or PFNA2 (n = 102). Their intraoperative and postoperative clinical and radiographic data were evaluated along with the quality of fixation. Data analysis was performed using the student's t-test, 2 test, and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

PFNA2 demonstrated more favorable outcomes compared to PFN in terms of a better intraoperative profile, functional outcomes (PFNA2: PFN = 82:75), and fewer implant-related complications. Significant issues in the PFN group included screw back-out, guidewire breakage, and proximal protrusion of the nail tip. In contrast, locking mechanism failure and lateral screw prominence were significant problems in the PFNA2 group.

CONCLUSION

PFNA2 is the preferred implant for managing osteoporotic unstable intertrochanteric fractures, given the bone's weak inherent tendency to secure the implant.