Injury · 2025
Outcomes of outpatient hand extensor tendon injury repairs in Northern Ireland's regional plastic surgery service.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lim Yizhe, Lim Su Kwan, Beswick William, Razo Michelle, Dustagheer Shakeel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Acute extensor tendon injuries of the hand, commonly managed by plastic surgeons, require timely repair to optimize outcomes. This study evaluates the functional results, complications, and patient-reported outcomes of acute extensor tendon repairs performed in an outpatient setting using the Wide Awake Local Anaesthetic No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique in Northern Ireland.
METHODS: A retrospective service evaluation analyzed 222 patients undergoing extensor tendon repair between 2018 and 2023. Inclusion criteria were adults (>18 years) with open injuries repaired via sutures. Exclusions included partial tears, fractures, and chronic injuries. Primary outcomes included Total Active Motion (TAM) and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) scores. Secondary outcomes were infection, rupture rates, and grip strength.
RESULTS: Mean age was 41 years, with 72.5 % males and 54.1 % non-dominant hand injuries. Mechanisms included lacerations (64 %), crush injuries (22 %), and avulsions (14 %). TAM was comparable across injury zones (Verdan classification), though distal zones (e.g., Zone 1) showed ∼30° lower TAM. PRWHE scores (mean: 8.2/50) indicated minimal pain/functional disability. Complications included two superficial infections (0.82 %) and one re-rupture (0.41 %). Grip strength matched normative values. Controlled Active Motion (CAM) rehabilitation yielded satisfactory outcomes, with proximal zones (Zones 7-8) associated with poorer PROMs.
CONCLUSION: Outpatient extensor tendon repair under WALANT is safe and effective, with low complication rates and favorable functional outcomes. Timely repair (<3 days), meticulous technique, and CAM rehabilitation contributed to success, supporting cost-effective management outside main operating theatres. Proximal injuries and rehabilitation protocols warrant further optimization. This study addresses a regional literature gap, advocating for prospective research to refine surgical and therapeutic strategies.
THERAPEUTIC LEVEL: IV.
METHODS: A retrospective service evaluation analyzed 222 patients undergoing extensor tendon repair between 2018 and 2023. Inclusion criteria were adults (>18 years) with open injuries repaired via sutures. Exclusions included partial tears, fractures, and chronic injuries. Primary outcomes included Total Active Motion (TAM) and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) scores. Secondary outcomes were infection, rupture rates, and grip strength.
RESULTS: Mean age was 41 years, with 72.5 % males and 54.1 % non-dominant hand injuries. Mechanisms included lacerations (64 %), crush injuries (22 %), and avulsions (14 %). TAM was comparable across injury zones (Verdan classification), though distal zones (e.g., Zone 1) showed ∼30° lower TAM. PRWHE scores (mean: 8.2/50) indicated minimal pain/functional disability. Complications included two superficial infections (0.82 %) and one re-rupture (0.41 %). Grip strength matched normative values. Controlled Active Motion (CAM) rehabilitation yielded satisfactory outcomes, with proximal zones (Zones 7-8) associated with poorer PROMs.
CONCLUSION: Outpatient extensor tendon repair under WALANT is safe and effective, with low complication rates and favorable functional outcomes. Timely repair (<3 days), meticulous technique, and CAM rehabilitation contributed to success, supporting cost-effective management outside main operating theatres. Proximal injuries and rehabilitation protocols warrant further optimization. This study addresses a regional literature gap, advocating for prospective research to refine surgical and therapeutic strategies.
THERAPEUTIC LEVEL: IV.