MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin · 2026

Cervical Tuberculosis Lymphadenitis (Scrofula) in Wisconsin: Case Report, Pitfalls, and Challenges.

Figueroa Castro Carlos E, Shera April A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

This case report presents a case of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis (scrofula) in Wisconsin, illustrating the diagnostic challenges in a low-prevalence setting. It emphasizes the importance of including tuberculosis (TB) in the differential diagnosis of persistent cervical lymphadenopathy, particularly in patients with a history of latent TB infection.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old woman presented with a persistent, painless left-sided neck mass without local warmth or erythema, characteristic of a cold abscess. Initial imaging demonstrated lymph node abnormalities, while multiple diagnostic tests were inconclusive. After misdiagnosis and unsuccessful treatments, she was eventually diagnosed with TB lymphadenitis. She completed a prolonged course of antituberculous therapy, followed by surgical intervention, with complete resolution of symptoms.

DISCUSSION: This case underscores the need for a high index of suspicion for tuberculosis in patients with chronic cervical lymphadenopathy, even in regions with low TB prevalence. It also highlights the importance of thorough clinical and exposure history and the potential for diagnostic delay in atypical presentations, particularly when medical records are fragmented across health care systems.

Для цитирования: Figueroa Castro Carlos E, Shera April A. Cervical Tuberculosis Lymphadenitis (Scrofula) in Wisconsin: Case Report, Pitfalls, and Challenges.. WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin. 2026.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.