International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025
Impact of first ambulation time on unilateral biportal endoscopy in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tang Yi, Zhang Zhongyi, Wu Zhouhan, Jin Zhaokai, Gong Yichen, Zhang Wen, Cheng Kai, Zhou Jiaju, Tong Peijian, Xu Taotao, Lv Shuaijie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of early versus late postoperative ambulation on clinical outcomes and complications following unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) for lumbar disc herniation.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to February 2025. Eligible studies were grouped based on ambulation timing: early (<24 hours) versus late (≥24 hours). Outcomes included changes in leg pain and back pain measured by the visual analog scale, functional recovery via the Oswestry Disability Index (ΔODI), complication rates, and patient satisfaction (MacNab criteria). A random-effects model was used to pool data and calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: Fourteen retrospective studies comprising 715 patients were included (early group: 230; late group: 485). Early ambulation significantly improved leg pain within 3 days (WMD = -6.87; 95% CI: -7.48 to -6.26; P < 0.001) and at 6 months (WMD = -7.59; 95% CI: -7.98 to -7.20; P < 0.001), both exceeding the minimal clinically important difference. No significant between-group differences were observed for back pain (all time points), functional outcomes (ΔODI), complication rates, or patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Early ambulation (<24 hours) after UBE is associated with superior short-term relief of leg pain and does not increase postoperative complication risk. However, it offers no advantage in long-term pain, disability, or satisfaction. Early mobilization can be safely recommended as part of postoperative care, with individualized protocols based on patient and surgical factors.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to February 2025. Eligible studies were grouped based on ambulation timing: early (<24 hours) versus late (≥24 hours). Outcomes included changes in leg pain and back pain measured by the visual analog scale, functional recovery via the Oswestry Disability Index (ΔODI), complication rates, and patient satisfaction (MacNab criteria). A random-effects model was used to pool data and calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: Fourteen retrospective studies comprising 715 patients were included (early group: 230; late group: 485). Early ambulation significantly improved leg pain within 3 days (WMD = -6.87; 95% CI: -7.48 to -6.26; P < 0.001) and at 6 months (WMD = -7.59; 95% CI: -7.98 to -7.20; P < 0.001), both exceeding the minimal clinically important difference. No significant between-group differences were observed for back pain (all time points), functional outcomes (ΔODI), complication rates, or patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Early ambulation (<24 hours) after UBE is associated with superior short-term relief of leg pain and does not increase postoperative complication risk. However, it offers no advantage in long-term pain, disability, or satisfaction. Early mobilization can be safely recommended as part of postoperative care, with individualized protocols based on patient and surgical factors.