MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10067-022-06354-1

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical rheumatology · 2022

Nailfold capillaroscopy: tips and challenges.

El Miedany Yasser, Ismail Sherif, Wadie Mary, Hassan Mohammed

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Although nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) appears to have a bright future in clinical practice, the lack of familiarity with the technique and how to interpret its outcomes is major barriers which have made nailfold capillaroscopy an underutilized method in standard clinical practice. Traditional methods for assessment and measurement of capillary patterns, density, and blood flow are falling behind and face some challenges. In fact, there have been calls for improvement, hence the recent publication of the standardization of NFC by the EULAR Study Group on Microcirculation in Rheumatic Diseases. Nailfold capillaroscopy has the advantage of being a non-invasive technique that provides a window into the digital microcirculation. This paved the way for a rapidly growing interest in using capillaroscopy parameters as outcome measures in research. In standard clinical practice, whilst its main application is in the identification of an underlying systemic sclerosis spectrum disorder in patients presenting with Raynaud's phenomenon, its use has expanded to include other clinical features possibly suggestive of an underlying connective tissue disease. This article presents the challenges, provides tips, and highlights the exciting potential of nailfold capillaroscopy in standard practice.

Для цитирования: El Miedany Yasser, Ismail Sherif, Wadie Mary, Hassan Mohammed. Nailfold capillaroscopy: tips and challenges.. Clinical rheumatology. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06354-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.