MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3855/jidc.18804

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of infection in developing countries · 2023

Predisposing factor, impactful adjunctive treatment or unfavorable prognostic marker: a meta-analysis on the elusive role of dexamethasone for Listeria monocytogenes meningitis.

Maraolo Alberto Enrico, Mazzitelli Maria

ОбзорМетаанализСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

There are no randomized controlled trials to inform the choice of using adjunctive dexamethasone (AD) against Listeria monocytogenes meningitis (LMM) and data from observational studies are pretty conflicting.

METHODOLOGY: We performed a rapid review of the literature with quantitative analysis. A pairwise random-effects meta-analysis was implemented, pooling unadjusted and adjusted data. The main outcome was mortality.

RESULTS

Across all included studies (five) informing the main analysis on raw mortality data, 199 patients received AD, as opposed to 382 who did not receive AD. All-cause mortality was slightly lower in patients undergoing AD, but not in a statistically significant manner: odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.42-2.19. The prediction interval was very wide (0.06-15.99), suggesting that in future studies the effect of AD might be either beneficial or harmful.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of AD for LMM still needs to be established being the current evidence inconclusive and heterogeneous.

Для цитирования: Maraolo Alberto Enrico, Mazzitelli Maria. Predisposing factor, impactful adjunctive treatment or unfavorable prognostic marker: a meta-analysis on the elusive role of dexamethasone for Listeria monocytogenes meningitis.. Journal of infection in developing countries. 2023. DOI: 10.3855/jidc.18804.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.