MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00264-023-05879-7

Медицинская библиотека · International orthopaedics · 2023

External fixation versus intramedullary nailing for the management of open tibial fracture: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Alsharef Jawaher F, Ghaddaf Abdullah A, AlQuhaibi Mohammed S, Shaheen Esraa A, AboAljadiel Lamar H, Alharbi Abdullah S, AlHidri Bashair Y, Alamri Mohammed K, Makhdom Asim M

МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: Tibial shaft fractures are the most common type of long-bone fractures. External fixation (EF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are widely used surgical techniques for the definitive fixation of open tibial shaft fractures. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare EF to IMN for the definitive fixation of open tibial fractures.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for eligible studies. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared EF to IMN for skeletally mature adults with open tibial fracture (Gustilo I, II, and III). We evaluated the following outcomes: superficial infection, pin-track infection, deep infection, malunion, nonunion, delayed union, and implant/hardware failure. The risk ratio (RR) was used to represent the desired outcomes. The statistical analysis was performed using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 12 RCTs that enrolled 1090 participants were deemed eligible for the analysis. EF showed a significantly higher rate of superficial infection, pin track infection, and malunion compared to IMN (RR = 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34 to 3.95; RR = 13.52, 95% CI: 6.16 to 29.66; RR = 2.29, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.73, respectively). No substantial difference was found between EF and IMN in terms of deep infection, nonunion, delayed union, or implant/hardware failure (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.98; RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10; RR = 1.50, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.33; RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.60, respectively).

DISCUSSION: The findings of our meta-analysis are consistent with the previous systematic reviews excepts for the implant/hardware failure which was found to be significant in favour of IMN by one of the previous reviews.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms that IMN is better than EF with respect to clinical outcomes and complication rate for the definitive fixation of open tibial fracture.

Для цитирования: Alsharef Jawaher F, Ghaddaf Abdullah A, AlQuhaibi Mohammed S, Shaheen Esraa A, AboAljadiel Lamar H, Alharbi Abdullah S, AlHidri Bashair Y, Alamri Mohammed K, Makhdom Asim M. External fixation versus intramedullary nailing for the management of open tibial fracture: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. International orthopaedics. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05879-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.