The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026
Re-evaluating the role of oxygen delivery and radiographs in the definition of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: A Lung Transplant Outcomes Group cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anderson Michaela R, Gallop Robert, Localio A Russell, Oyster Michelle, Kalman Laurel, Griffiths Stephen, Hartwig Matthew, Snyder Laurie D, Shashaty Michael, Ahya Vivek, Crespo Maria, Biscotti Mauer, Mezochow Gabrielle, Pandya Krishna, Gasior Julia, Calabrese Daniel, Greenland John R, Benvenuto Luke, Dhillon Gundeep, Combs Michael P, McDyer John, Hage Chadi, Roe David, Shah Pali, Merlo Christian, Singer Jonathan P, Palmer Scott M, Christie Jason D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is severe lung injury following lung transplantation. Variable radiograph interpretation and changes in mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for hypoxemia may limit the current PGD definition's validity.
METHODS: We assessed whether changes in the PGD definition accounting for oxygen delivery method (intubated, non-intubated, ECMO) were associated with differential graft survival. Severe PGD was grade 3 at 48 or 72 hours after transplant. We estimated crude and standardized time from transplantation to death or retransplantation with each alternate defining criterion. We secondarily evaluated whether excluding chest radiography led to severe PGD re-classification.
RESULTS: Among 3,170 recipients, 749 (24%) had severe PGD by current definition. By revised oxygen delivery definition, 182 non-intubated recipients and 372 intubated recipients had severe PGD, and 177 recipients had severe PGD requiring ECMO. Recipients with severe PGD requiring ECMO had the highest 1-year mortality (cumulative incidence of death 0.20, 95%CI 0.17-0.24), followed by intubated severe PGD (0.15, 95%CI 0.13-0.17). Non-intubated recipients had similar mortality with and without severe PGD (non-intubated with PGD: 1-year cumulative incidence of death 0.11, 95%CI 0.09-0.13; non-intubated without severe PGD: 0.10, 95%CI 0.09-0.11). Exclusion of radiographs reclassified 814 recipients, including 89 (11%) reclassified as severe PGD. On review of radiographs from recipients reclassified as severe PGD, the most frequent findings were effusions, atelectasis, and pneumonia.
CONCLUSION: A revised PGD definition stratified by mode of oxygen delivery identifies groups with differential mortality. Chest radiography is critical to excluding alternative causes of lung injury in recipients with severe hypoxemia.
METHODS: We assessed whether changes in the PGD definition accounting for oxygen delivery method (intubated, non-intubated, ECMO) were associated with differential graft survival. Severe PGD was grade 3 at 48 or 72 hours after transplant. We estimated crude and standardized time from transplantation to death or retransplantation with each alternate defining criterion. We secondarily evaluated whether excluding chest radiography led to severe PGD re-classification.
RESULTS: Among 3,170 recipients, 749 (24%) had severe PGD by current definition. By revised oxygen delivery definition, 182 non-intubated recipients and 372 intubated recipients had severe PGD, and 177 recipients had severe PGD requiring ECMO. Recipients with severe PGD requiring ECMO had the highest 1-year mortality (cumulative incidence of death 0.20, 95%CI 0.17-0.24), followed by intubated severe PGD (0.15, 95%CI 0.13-0.17). Non-intubated recipients had similar mortality with and without severe PGD (non-intubated with PGD: 1-year cumulative incidence of death 0.11, 95%CI 0.09-0.13; non-intubated without severe PGD: 0.10, 95%CI 0.09-0.11). Exclusion of radiographs reclassified 814 recipients, including 89 (11%) reclassified as severe PGD. On review of radiographs from recipients reclassified as severe PGD, the most frequent findings were effusions, atelectasis, and pneumonia.
CONCLUSION: A revised PGD definition stratified by mode of oxygen delivery identifies groups with differential mortality. Chest radiography is critical to excluding alternative causes of lung injury in recipients with severe hypoxemia.