MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1503/cjs.012222

Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2023

Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?

Schemitsch Emil H, Kumar Ashesh, Heels-Ansdell Diane, Sprague Sheila, Bhandari Mohit, Guyatt Gordon, Sanders David W, Swiontkowski Marc, Tornetta Paul, Walter Stephen, SPRINT Investigators

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patients with a tibial shaft fracture experiencing their first postoperative complication following treatment with intramedullary nails may be at greater risk of subsequent complications than the whole population. We aimed to determine whether the initial method of nail insertion influences outcome in patients with a tibial shaft fracture requiring multiple reoperations.

METHODS

Using the Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Tibial Shaft Fractures trial data, we categorized patients as those not requiring reoperation, those requiring a single reoperation and those requiring multiple reoperations, and we compared them by nail insertion technique (reamed v. unreamed) and fracture type (open v. closed). We then determined the number of patients whose first reoperation was in response to infection, and we compared other clinical outcomes between the reamed and unreamed groups.

RESULTS

Among 1226 patients included in this analysis, 175 (14.27%) experienced a single reoperation and 44 patients (3.59%) underwent multiple reoperations. Nail insertion techniques (reamed v. unreamed) did not play a role in the need to perform multiple reoperations. Seventy-five percent of patients requiring multiple reoperations had open tibial shaft fractures. An equal number of these were reamed and unreamed insertions. The majority of patients had their course complicated by infection and almost 50% of patients whose first reoperation was for infection required more than 2 reoperations for management. The rest required multiple procedures for nonunion or bone loss.

CONCLUSION

Our findings corroborate those of other studies, in which open fracture type rather than nail insertion technique was found to be the cause of morbidity following intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.

CLINICALTRIALS: gov, no. NCT00038129.

Для цитирования: Schemitsch Emil H, Kumar Ashesh, Heels-Ansdell Diane, Sprague Sheila, Bhandari Mohit, Guyatt Gordon, Sanders David W, Swiontkowski Marc, Tornetta Paul, Walter Stephen, SPRINT Investigators. Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?. Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. 2023. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.012222.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.