The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2026
Whole genome sequencing precision medicine strategy to shorten treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (SMARTT): a pragmatic, randomised, single-blind phase 4 trial.
Клиническое исследование IV фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеPragmatic Clinical TrialРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Van Rie Annelies, Conceição Emilyn Costa, Ndebele Felex, Wells Felicia, Paulse Astrid, Mekonnen Eskedar Getie, Ngarega Miriam, Trang Tu Pham Hien, Bohlela Sthabiso, Sibeko Zandile, Segwaba Pulane, Verboven Lennert, Heupink Tim H, Fuertes Miguel De Diego, Rennie Vincent, Dippenaar Anzaan, Rigouts Leen, Setlhare Leole, Ogunbayo Ayodeji Emmanuel, VanderSpoel Van Dyk Anneke, Conradie Francesca, Maartens Gary, Potgieter Samantha, Black John, Fanampe Boitumelo, Abrams Steven, Churchyard Gavin, Warren Robin, Charalambous Salome
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: All patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis should receive a short course of effective treatment. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of whole genome sequencing (WGS)-guided treatment in shortening duration of treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.
METHODS: We did a pragmatic, randomised, single-blind phase 4 trial in 13 hospitals and 35 clinics in South Africa. Adults with pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis were randomly assigned (1:1, using adaptive randomisation) to standard of care (WHO all-oral 9-month, seven-drug regimen or 18-month individualised regimen) or a four-drug, 6-month WGS-guided regimen generated by a feature-based artificial intelligence (AI) model. Bacteriological effectiveness, defined as difference in time to culture conversion measured as change in mycobacterial load using a non-linear mixed-effects model, was the primary outcome. Due to operational constraints and the inability to perform culture-free WGS, we performed an analysis of clinical effectiveness in a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (risk difference for unfavourable treatment outcomes, 10% non-inferiority margin) and safety (serious adverse events). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05017324.
FINDINGS: 204 participants were randomly assigned between Sept 23, 2021, and Feb 9, 2023 (101 to the standard of care group, 103 to the WGS group), of which 162 culture-positive individuals were included in the mITT analysis (78 in the standard of care group, 84 in the WGS group). mITT participants were mostly male (n=120 [74%]) and living with HIV (n=100 [63%]) and had rifampicin-resistant, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (n=142 [88%]), pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (n=15 [9%]), or extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (n=5 [3%]). In the WGS group, 15 different individualised regimens were recommended to 81 participants, and median treatment duration was shortened by 2·6 months. Bacteriological response was similar in both groups with a mean mycobacterial load half-life of 0·30 weeks (95% CI 0·27 to 0·33) in the WGS group versus 0·31 weeks (95% CI 0·31 to 0·31) in the standard of care group (relative difference 0·97, 95% CI -0·86 to 1·07; p=0·26). Unfavourable treatment outcomes (bacteriological failure, loss to follow-up, or death) were less frequent in the WGS group (20 [24%] of 82 vs 32 [42%] of 77; adjusted risk difference -18·4 percentage points, 95% CI -35.6 to -1.2); superiority p=0.018), mostly due to reduced loss to follow-up. The frequency of serious adverse events was similar between groups (23 [27%] of 84 in the WGS group vs 26 [33%] of 78 in the standard of care group; risk difference -6% percentage points, 95% CI -8 to 20; p=0.41).
INTERPRETATION: Using WGS and AI to select regimens with optimal drug features had similar bacteriological and superior clinical efficacy compared with standard of care and was safe. Future trials should evaluate the effectiveness of culture-free sequencing-guided treatment on relapse-free cure where the standard regimen for rifampicin-resistant, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin.
FUNDING: Research Foundation Flanders.
METHODS: We did a pragmatic, randomised, single-blind phase 4 trial in 13 hospitals and 35 clinics in South Africa. Adults with pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis were randomly assigned (1:1, using adaptive randomisation) to standard of care (WHO all-oral 9-month, seven-drug regimen or 18-month individualised regimen) or a four-drug, 6-month WGS-guided regimen generated by a feature-based artificial intelligence (AI) model. Bacteriological effectiveness, defined as difference in time to culture conversion measured as change in mycobacterial load using a non-linear mixed-effects model, was the primary outcome. Due to operational constraints and the inability to perform culture-free WGS, we performed an analysis of clinical effectiveness in a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (risk difference for unfavourable treatment outcomes, 10% non-inferiority margin) and safety (serious adverse events). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05017324.
FINDINGS: 204 participants were randomly assigned between Sept 23, 2021, and Feb 9, 2023 (101 to the standard of care group, 103 to the WGS group), of which 162 culture-positive individuals were included in the mITT analysis (78 in the standard of care group, 84 in the WGS group). mITT participants were mostly male (n=120 [74%]) and living with HIV (n=100 [63%]) and had rifampicin-resistant, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (n=142 [88%]), pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (n=15 [9%]), or extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (n=5 [3%]). In the WGS group, 15 different individualised regimens were recommended to 81 participants, and median treatment duration was shortened by 2·6 months. Bacteriological response was similar in both groups with a mean mycobacterial load half-life of 0·30 weeks (95% CI 0·27 to 0·33) in the WGS group versus 0·31 weeks (95% CI 0·31 to 0·31) in the standard of care group (relative difference 0·97, 95% CI -0·86 to 1·07; p=0·26). Unfavourable treatment outcomes (bacteriological failure, loss to follow-up, or death) were less frequent in the WGS group (20 [24%] of 82 vs 32 [42%] of 77; adjusted risk difference -18·4 percentage points, 95% CI -35.6 to -1.2); superiority p=0.018), mostly due to reduced loss to follow-up. The frequency of serious adverse events was similar between groups (23 [27%] of 84 in the WGS group vs 26 [33%] of 78 in the standard of care group; risk difference -6% percentage points, 95% CI -8 to 20; p=0.41).
INTERPRETATION: Using WGS and AI to select regimens with optimal drug features had similar bacteriological and superior clinical efficacy compared with standard of care and was safe. Future trials should evaluate the effectiveness of culture-free sequencing-guided treatment on relapse-free cure where the standard regimen for rifampicin-resistant, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin.
FUNDING: Research Foundation Flanders.