Clinical laboratory · 2026
Diagnostic Efficacy of Nanopore Sequencing Using Clinical Specimens for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yu Guocan, Shen Yanqin, Zhong Fangming, Xu Xudong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of nanopore sequencing using clinical specimens for the rapid diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) and to provide a new detection tool for the early diagnosis of NTM-PD.
METHODS: Information regarding patients with suspected Mycobacterium infection with lung disease was retrospectively analyzed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) for nanopore sequencing compared with those for NTM culture.
RESULTS: Overall, 871 patients were enrolled in the study. By using NTM culture as the reference standard for diagnosing NTM-PD, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC were found to be 93.3% (95% CI: 86.1% - 97.5%), 97.2% (95% CI: 95.8% - 98.2%), 78.5% (95% CI: 69.5% - 85.9%), 99.2% (95% CI: 98.4% - 99.7%), and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94 - 0.97) for nanopore sequencing, respectively. The overall accuracy of diagnosing NTM-PD was excellent for nanopore sequencing.
CONCLUSIONS: Nanopore sequencing analysis of clinical specimens offers high diagnostic accuracy for detecting NTM-PD. Furthermore, this approach can be used as the priority diagnostic tool for detecting NTM-PD.
METHODS: Information regarding patients with suspected Mycobacterium infection with lung disease was retrospectively analyzed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) for nanopore sequencing compared with those for NTM culture.
RESULTS: Overall, 871 patients were enrolled in the study. By using NTM culture as the reference standard for diagnosing NTM-PD, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC were found to be 93.3% (95% CI: 86.1% - 97.5%), 97.2% (95% CI: 95.8% - 98.2%), 78.5% (95% CI: 69.5% - 85.9%), 99.2% (95% CI: 98.4% - 99.7%), and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94 - 0.97) for nanopore sequencing, respectively. The overall accuracy of diagnosing NTM-PD was excellent for nanopore sequencing.
CONCLUSIONS: Nanopore sequencing analysis of clinical specimens offers high diagnostic accuracy for detecting NTM-PD. Furthermore, this approach can be used as the priority diagnostic tool for detecting NTM-PD.