Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2017
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials) in Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Brachial Plexus Avulsion Pain.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Son Byung-Chul, Choi Jin-Gyu, Ha Sang-Woo, Kim Deog-Ryeong
Аннотация
AIMS: To address the feasibility and importance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain.
METHODS: Muscle motor evoked potential (mMEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) were applied during DREZ lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain.
RESULTS: IONM of mMEPs and SSEPs was feasible for monitoring of the spinal cord during DREZ lesioning. With the exception of 3 unrecordable mMEPs in ipsilateral arms, mMEPs were preserved and referenced to look for changes according to lesioning in 6 upper extremities (66.6%) and 8 lower extremities. All 3 patients with >50% reduction in baseline mMEP amplitude after lesioning in either the ipsilateral upper or lower extremities showed postoperative ataxia and weakness of the lower extremities (100%). Only 2 out of 9 patients (22.2%) with brachial plexus avulsion pain had discernible baseline SSEPs in the ipsilateral upper extremities. One of 2 patients with discernible SSEPs in the upper extremities showed significant SSEP events during the DREZ lesioning and experienced postoperative ataxia and weakness in the legs despite the absence of a SSEP event in the lower extremities.
CONCLUSION: Significant events on IONM were common during DREZ lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain and were closely related to the occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits.
METHODS: Muscle motor evoked potential (mMEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) were applied during DREZ lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain.
RESULTS: IONM of mMEPs and SSEPs was feasible for monitoring of the spinal cord during DREZ lesioning. With the exception of 3 unrecordable mMEPs in ipsilateral arms, mMEPs were preserved and referenced to look for changes according to lesioning in 6 upper extremities (66.6%) and 8 lower extremities. All 3 patients with >50% reduction in baseline mMEP amplitude after lesioning in either the ipsilateral upper or lower extremities showed postoperative ataxia and weakness of the lower extremities (100%). Only 2 out of 9 patients (22.2%) with brachial plexus avulsion pain had discernible baseline SSEPs in the ipsilateral upper extremities. One of 2 patients with discernible SSEPs in the upper extremities showed significant SSEP events during the DREZ lesioning and experienced postoperative ataxia and weakness in the legs despite the absence of a SSEP event in the lower extremities.
CONCLUSION: Significant events on IONM were common during DREZ lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain and were closely related to the occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits.