MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.241

Медицинская библиотека · The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2017

Value of physical tests in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review.

Thoomes Erik J, van Geest Sarita, van der Windt Danielle A, Falla Deborah, Verhagen Arianne P, Koes Bart W, Thoomes-de Graaf Marloes, Kuijper Barbara, Scholten-Peeters Wendy G M, Vleggeert-Lankamp Carmen L

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In clinical practice, the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy is based on information from the patient's history, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging. Various physical tests may be performed, but their diagnostic accuracy is unknown.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to summarize and update the evidence on diagnostic performance of tests carried out during a physical examination for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.

STUDY

DESIGN

A review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests was carried out.

STUDY SAMPLE: The study sample comprised diagnostic studies comparing results of tests performed during a physical examination in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy with a reference standard of imaging or surgical findings.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios are presented, together with pooled results for sensitivity and specificity.

METHODS

A literature search up to March 2016 was performed in CENTRAL, PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2.

RESULTS

Five diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. Only Spurling's test was evaluated in more than one study, showing high specificity ranging from 0.89 to 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.00); sensitivity varied from 0.38 to 0.97 (95% CI: 0.21-0.99). No studies were found that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of widely used neurological tests such as key muscle strength, tendon reflexes, and sensory impairments.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence for accuracy of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. When consistent with patient history, clinicians may use a combination of Spurling's, axial traction, and an Arm Squeeze test to increase the likelihood of a cervical radiculopathy, whereas a combined results of four negative neurodynamics tests and an Arm Squeeze test could be used to rule out the disorder.

Для цитирования: Thoomes Erik J, van Geest Sarita, van der Windt Danielle A, Falla Deborah, Verhagen Arianne P, Koes Bart W, Thoomes-de Graaf Marloes, Kuijper Barbara, Scholten-Peeters Wendy G M, Vleggeert-Lankamp Carmen L. Value of physical tests in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review.. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.241.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.