MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of trauma · 1985

Increased susceptibility of patients with cervical cord lesions to peptic gastrointestinal complications.

Soderstrom C A, Ducker T B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The incidence and risk factors in the development of hemorrhaging and perforating gastrointestinal (GI) lesions in 408 patients with cervical column/cord injury were studied retrospectively. Most injuries were caused by blunt trauma (94.1%). Male patients predominated (83.6%); the mean patient age was 35.8 years. Of the 408 patients, 190 (46.6%) had complete cord deficits, 111 (27.2%) had incomplete deficits, and 107 (26.2%) were intact. Admission shock (systolic BP less than 100 mm Hg) was present in 31.6% and 20.7% of patients with complete and incomplete lesions, respectively, and in 4.7% of those intact. Patients with complete deficits received corticosteroids for 2 days; patients with incomplete deficits received them for 7 to 10 days. Eleven of the 107 intact patients (10.3%) received steroids. All patients received standard antacid therapy. Nine patients without previous GI disease developed peptic ulcerations: six gastric and three duodenal lesions (six were perforated) that required surgical intervention; all occurred in patients with complete deficits. Both the 4.7% incidence of the lesions in those patients compared with the other victims of cervical trauma and an estimated 0.1% incidence among more than 6,000 other seriously injured patients are significant (p less than 0.005, p less than 0.001). Steroids were not an ulcerogenic factor.

Для цитирования: Soderstrom C A, Ducker T B. Increased susceptibility of patients with cervical cord lesions to peptic gastrointestinal complications.. The Journal of trauma. 1985.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.