Central European journal of public health · 2025
Possibilities of influencing the function of the deep stabilization system by exercising for low back pain.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Žiaková Elena, Sládeková Nina, Havlová Jana
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Chronic back pain is the most common cause of incapacity for work. The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness for activating the function of the deep stabilization system (DSS) in patients with chronic low back pain.
METHODS: The effectiveness of three different methods was compared: Pilates method (PM), dynamic neuromuscular stabilization and balance aids on deep stabilization system function and pain perception in the lumbar spine. The group consisted of 75 patients.
RESULTS: The results show differences in the effectiveness of the methods depending on the observed characteristics. The least significant differences were observed when comparing the Pilates method to balance aids. No statistically significant difference was observed in four out of five areas. The only area where a statistically significant effect of the exercise method got recorded was the intra-abdominal pressure test (p < 0.05). The lowest change was recorded in the measured values using the intra-abdominal pressure test at PM, and the highest change was recorded in Thomayer's values at dynamic neuromuscular stabilization.
CONCLUSION: By comparing the three methods it was noted that each of them has its own positive reaction to the pain and the muscular apparatus. The most appropriate method to affect DSS function appears the dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS) concept, where was the most significant improvement in DSS activation and the most significant reduction in chronic low back pain.
METHODS: The effectiveness of three different methods was compared: Pilates method (PM), dynamic neuromuscular stabilization and balance aids on deep stabilization system function and pain perception in the lumbar spine. The group consisted of 75 patients.
RESULTS: The results show differences in the effectiveness of the methods depending on the observed characteristics. The least significant differences were observed when comparing the Pilates method to balance aids. No statistically significant difference was observed in four out of five areas. The only area where a statistically significant effect of the exercise method got recorded was the intra-abdominal pressure test (p < 0.05). The lowest change was recorded in the measured values using the intra-abdominal pressure test at PM, and the highest change was recorded in Thomayer's values at dynamic neuromuscular stabilization.
CONCLUSION: By comparing the three methods it was noted that each of them has its own positive reaction to the pain and the muscular apparatus. The most appropriate method to affect DSS function appears the dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS) concept, where was the most significant improvement in DSS activation and the most significant reduction in chronic low back pain.