MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.12.001

Медицинская библиотека · Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2017

Evaluation of interobserver agreement in Albertoni's classification for mallet finger.

Almeida Vinícius Alexandre de Souza, Fernandes Carlos Henrique, Santos João Baptista Gomes Dos, Schwarz-Fernandes Francisco Alberto, Faloppa Flavio, Albertoni Walter Manna

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To measure the reliability of Albertoni's classification for mallet finger.

METHODS

Agreement study. Forty-three radiographs of patients with mallet finger were assessed by 19 responders (12 hand surgeons and seven residents). Injuries were classified by Albertoni's classification. For agreement comparison, lesions were grouped as: (A) tendon avulsion; (B) avulsion fracture; (C) fracture of the dorsal lip; and (D) physis injury-and subgroups (each group divided into two subgroups). Agreement was assessed by Fleiss's modification for kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Agreement was excellent for Group A (k = 0.95 (0.93-0.97)) and remained good when separated into A1 and A2. Group B was moderate (k = 0.42 (0.39-0.44)) and poor when separated into B1 and B2. In the Group C, agreement was good (k = 0.72 (0.70-0.74)), but when separated into C1 and C2, it became moderate. Group D was always poor (k = 0.16 (0.14-0.19)). The general agreement was moderate, with (k = 0.57 (0.56-0.58)).

CONCLUSION

Albertoni's classification evaluated for interobserver agreement is considered a reproducible classification by the method used in the research.

Для цитирования: Almeida Vinícius Alexandre de Souza, Fernandes Carlos Henrique, Santos João Baptista Gomes Dos, Schwarz-Fernandes Francisco Alberto, Faloppa Flavio, Albertoni Walter Manna. Evaluation of interobserver agreement in Albertoni's classification for mallet finger.. Revista brasileira de ortopedia. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.12.001.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.