MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jos.2017.05.012

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association · 2017

Factors associated with the decision of operative procedure for proximal femoral bone metastasis: Questionnaire survey to institutions participating the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group.

Araki Nobuhito, Chuman Hirokazu, Matsunobu Tomoya, Tanaka Kazuhiro, Katagiri Hirohisa, Kunisada Toshiyuki, Hiruma Toru, Hiraga Hiroaki, Morioka Hideo, Hatano Hiroshi, Asanuma Kunihiro, Nishida Yoshihiro, Hiraoka Koji, Okamoto Takeshi, Abe Satoshi, Watanuki Munenori, Morii Takeshi, Sugiura Hideshi, Yoshida Yukihiro, Ohno Takatoshi, Outani Hidetatsu, Yokoyama Koichiro, Shimose Shoji, Fukuda Haruhiko, Iwamoto Yukihide

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pathological fracture of the proximal femur is a main cause of cancer patients losing their ability to walk. Although both osteosynthetic devices (predominantly intramedullary nails) and prosthetic replacement have been widely performed for treatment, controversies exist regarding which procedure should be used for the various conditions. In order to decide the eligibility criteria of a planned randomized prospective study about the treatment of pathological fractures of the proximal femur, we assessed the factors affecting the selection of operative procedures using questionnaires sent to the members of the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Study Group (BSTTSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG).

METHODS

Questionnaire surveys to evaluate (1) the priority levels of the factors, (2) the equipoise range of each factor in situations where either procedure could be applied, (3) risk and benefit of each procedure, and (4) the degree of bone destruction affecting the selection of operative procedures, were sent to 26 institutions.

RESULTS

Over 80% of the institutions answered. Orthopaedic surgeons of BSTTSG decided on the procedure according to the following factors in descending order: life expectancy, performance status before fracture, the degree of bone destruction, walking ability before fracture, general complications, the number of bone metastases in other sites, and the visceral metastasis status. With regard to bone destruction, (1) the involvement of the head, neck, calcar, and intertrochanteric region, (2) transverse destruction >1/2, and (3) soft-tissue tumor extension, were the factors that led to the choice of prosthesis treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Using these identified factors, the inclusion criteria for the prospective randomized study of the surgical treatment of metastatic bone tumors of the proximal femur were optimized. The evaluation system about the bone destruction of metastases needs to be refined through the following prospective randomized study.

Для цитирования: Araki Nobuhito, Chuman Hirokazu, Matsunobu Tomoya, Tanaka Kazuhiro, Katagiri Hirohisa, Kunisada Toshiyuki, Hiruma Toru, Hiraga Hiroaki, Morioka Hideo, Hatano Hiroshi, Asanuma Kunihiro, Nishida Yoshihiro, Hiraoka Koji, Okamoto Takeshi, Abe Satoshi, Watanuki Munenori, Morii Takeshi, Sugiura Hideshi, Yoshida Yukihiro, Ohno Takatoshi, Outani Hidetatsu, Yokoyama Koichiro, Shimose Shoji, Fukuda Haruhiko, Iwamoto Yukihide. Factors associated with the decision of operative procedure for proximal femoral bone metastasis: Questionnaire survey to institutions participating the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group.. Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.05.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.