Journal of bodywork and movement therapies · 2025
Reliability of an upper limb isokinetic evaluation in healthy individuals.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nardim Heloísa C B, Sugano Raquel M M, Fifolato Thaís M, Silva Mariana F, Lopes Ester R C, de Salvo Mauad Leonardo D, Xavier Dos Santos Gabriel Morais, Fonseca Marisa C R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Muscle strength is a key functionality indicator and can be objectively assessed using isokinetic dynamometry (IKD). However, IKD evaluation of the upper limb remains clinically challenging as in research settings.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of IKD measurements for the shoulder, elbow, forearm, and wrist at different speeds, as well as for isometric handgrip strength.
METHODS: Isokinetic strength and isometric handgrip assessments were performed using the Biodex System 4 Pro™ and the Jamar™ dynamometer. Participants were tested twice with a 7-day interval. The speeds tested were 60°/s and 120°/s in concentric mode. Reliability analysis was performed using the Intraclass Correlation Index. Spearman's Correlation Coefficient (p ≤ 0.05) analyzed the correlation between handgrip devices.
RESULTS: Thirty-three healthy participants were tested. Peak torque and isometric handgrip strength demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC: 0.87-0.98) at both speeds. The standard error of measurement ranged from 0.56 to 8.6, and the minimum detectable change from 1.5 to 23.8. Significant laterality differences were observed at 120°/s for shoulder adduction, internal and external rotation, elbow flexion and extension, and wrist extension. Significant speed-related differences were found in some movements, with higher mean peak torque at 60°/s. The Spearman coefficient indicated a strong correlation between Jamar™ and Biodex™ handgrip measurements for both sides.
CONCLUSION: Isokinetic and isometric assessments using the Biodex System 4 Pro™ are highly reproducible for the tested positions and speeds. Additionally, the Jamar™ and Biodex™ handgrip devices can be used interchangeably when measurement units are standardized.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of IKD measurements for the shoulder, elbow, forearm, and wrist at different speeds, as well as for isometric handgrip strength.
METHODS: Isokinetic strength and isometric handgrip assessments were performed using the Biodex System 4 Pro™ and the Jamar™ dynamometer. Participants were tested twice with a 7-day interval. The speeds tested were 60°/s and 120°/s in concentric mode. Reliability analysis was performed using the Intraclass Correlation Index. Spearman's Correlation Coefficient (p ≤ 0.05) analyzed the correlation between handgrip devices.
RESULTS: Thirty-three healthy participants were tested. Peak torque and isometric handgrip strength demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC: 0.87-0.98) at both speeds. The standard error of measurement ranged from 0.56 to 8.6, and the minimum detectable change from 1.5 to 23.8. Significant laterality differences were observed at 120°/s for shoulder adduction, internal and external rotation, elbow flexion and extension, and wrist extension. Significant speed-related differences were found in some movements, with higher mean peak torque at 60°/s. The Spearman coefficient indicated a strong correlation between Jamar™ and Biodex™ handgrip measurements for both sides.
CONCLUSION: Isokinetic and isometric assessments using the Biodex System 4 Pro™ are highly reproducible for the tested positions and speeds. Additionally, the Jamar™ and Biodex™ handgrip devices can be used interchangeably when measurement units are standardized.