[Clubfoot's prenatal ultrasound diagnosis: is amniocentesis always warranted? About 124 cases].

OBJECTIVES

Analyze factors leading to isolated clubfoot's occurrence, identify clubfeet associated pathologies, and discuss the opportunity of performing an amniocentesis in cases of isolated clubfoot.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2011, all patients diagnosed with clubfoot in our prenatal diagnostic center were retrospectively included. We then defined and analyzed idiopathic or isolated talipses equinovarus (ITEV) and clubfeet associated with others morphologic abnormalities or syndromic talipses equinovarus (STEV).

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-four clubfeet were analyzed. Forty-seven cases of ITEV, for which 34 caryotypes were performed with a normal result. Risk factors of ITEV in our series were male gender (P=0.0017), a family history of clubfoot (P=0.001) and primiparity (P=0.04). Seventy-seven cases of STEV were diagnosed, 14 of which had chromosomal abnormalities, 18 spina bifida and 10 musculo-skeletal abnormalities. Among the 124 cases of clubfeet, 25 were unilateral and 99 were bilateral. Bilateral talipses equinovarus do not constitute a risk factor of STEV (P=0.8).

DISCUSSION AND

CONCLUSION

We did not find any chromosomic abnormalities in cases of ITEV. The results of our study could lead to defer systematic amniocentesis in cases of primiparous women diagnosed with an ITEV, with a familial history of clubfoot and a male fetus. A referent echographist in prenatal diagnosis should still perform a systematic morphologic echography.