Comparison of internal and external fixation after debridement in the Masquelet technique for Cierny-Mader type IV tibial post-traumatic osteomyelitis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of internal fixation vs. external fixation after debridement in stage I of the Masquelet technique for Cierny-Mader (C-M) type Ⅳ chronic post-traumatic tibial osteomyelitis.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included patients with tibial osteomyelitis who underwent staged treatment with the Masquelet technique between January 2016 and June 2020 at the 920 Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of the PLA. The patients were grouped according to the fixation they received after stage I. Infection recurrence, time to radiological bone healing and full weight-bearing, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score were compared.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were included (50 males and 13 females). There were 40 and 23 patients with internal and external fixation, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the preoperative and intraoperative data (all P>0.05). After stage I operation, the infection control rates were 85.0% and 82.6% in the internal and external fixation groups (P=0.803), and these rates were 92.5% and 95.7% after stage II (P=0.621). There were no differences in the SAS scores (P=0.278), time to radiological union (P=0.795), time to full weight-bearing (P=0.725), AOFAS scores (P=0.302), HSS scores (P=0.085), and complication rates (P=0.593). There were 27 times complications in 19 patients, with an incidence of 42.9%, without significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences between the two fixation methods after debridement in stage I of the Masquelet technique for C-M type Ⅳ chronic post-traumatic tibia osteomyelitis.