MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.00814.x

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of dermatology · 2010

Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide in Japanese psoriatic arthritis patients.

Maejima Hideki, Aki Ryouichi, Watarai Akira, Shirai Kyoumi, Hamada Yuko, Katsuoka Kensei

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP) are highly considered to indicate disease severity and be predictive markers in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA patients who are positive for anti-CCP tend to progress more frequently to joint deformity and functionally deteriorate more than negative patients. A study concerning the presence of anti-CCP in Japanese patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has been published. Our aim was to clarify that anti-CCP could be a potentially useful marker in PsA patients. We herein describe a PsA patient with presence of anti-CCP. We examined anti-CCP in 15 patients with PsA, and compared with 18 controls who had other types of psoriasis. Three PsA patients were positive for anti-CCP, but no controls showed positive. The anti-CCP-positive patients had higher counts of radiographic erosion, higher prevalence rates of polyarticular disease, use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, and the human leukocyte antigen DRB1*04 shared epitope than negative patients. Our study demonstrated that anti-CCP was potentially both predictive and a severity marker of joint involvement in PsA, the same as in RA.

Для цитирования: Maejima Hideki, Aki Ryouichi, Watarai Akira, Shirai Kyoumi, Hamada Yuko, Katsuoka Kensei. Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide in Japanese psoriatic arthritis patients.. The Journal of dermatology. 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.00814.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.